10,897 words! (19 pages) on the website, plus links to other information.
You can't be serious if you think that anyone in their right mind is going
to sift through all that to get to your point, do you?
Care to summarize this Cecil B. DeMille epic into a few paragraphs for the
benefit of those who might care?
"wxliao" <wanxialiao_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f59903ee.0312201657.5c5daadb_at_posting.google.com...
> Sorry the link did not work. Here it is:
http://www.geocities.com/wliao.geo/
>
> JGJ <jgjacobs_at_NOSPAMShotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<3FE12E1A.9070409_at_NOSPAMShotmail.com>...
> > How did you make it to the U of T, you don't know how to make a
> > paragraph and your web site does not exist. This is either a prank, or
> > you have lost it.
> >
> > Scott wrote:
> > > Go back to China.
> > >
> > > On 17 Dec 2003 14:26:35 -0800, wanxialiao_at_hotmail.com (wxliao) wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>I am a Chinese immigrant residing in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. My
> > >>human rights case started with an academic dispute between a professor
> > >>at the University of Toronto and me about whether "the concept of
> > >>beauty" is a "European concept", which developed into a
> > >>political/racial persecution on me organized by the Canadian
> > >>Governments. This persecution involves a conspiracy of the Ontario
> > >>Human Rights Commission and the U of T to set me up for criminal
> > >>prosecution by entrapment using the "confidentiality rule" of the
> > >>Commission, and the court's blatant abuse of criminal justice in
> > >>finding me guilty without lawful grounds. The courts also take a
> > >>leading role in suppressing my civil actions to
> > >>seek redress of these wrongs. By court orders, the court openly
> > >>refused virtually all my legal rights provided by Ontario Rules of
> > >>Civil Procedures - my rights to Defendants' statement of defence, to
> > >>Defendants' Affidavits of Documents, to cross-examination on the
> > >>Affidavits, to examination on witnesses, to file motion to dismiss
> > >>Defendants' defence, and even to file responding motion materials to
> > >>respond to Defendants' motions to dismiss my actions, etc. As a result
> > >>I was in fact forbidden to make arguments to oppose the Defendants and
> > >>to gather and adduce evidences for my arguments. The court even
> > >>conspired to falsely and deliberately represent the relief I sought in
> > >>my motion in its order dismissing my motion, so that the issues I
> > >>raised would remain un-heard until my actions were dismissed on
> > >>Defendants' motions. The court did so at most of the times, without
> > >>even bothering to provide any reason. With the compelled exclusion of
> > >>my participation, the court decided on my cases one-sidedly with the
> > >>Defendants. My actions were dismissed and I am barred from the court
> > >>altogether. By this persecution, the Canadian Governments have
> > >>blatantly violated my fundamental human rights guaranteed by the
> > >>Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - my rights to freedom of
> > >>speech under s. 1; my right to freedom and liberty under s. 7; my
> > >>rights against self-incrimination and arbitrary detention under ss. 13
> > >>and 9; and my equality right before and under law under s. 15. And
> > >>same as that in Canada, the California Superior Court also abused the
> > >>law in headling my Complaint against James Cahill who participated in
> > >>the suppression of my human rights case. I have to publish my story on
> > >>the Internet since not only virtually all Canadian and U.S. media
> > >>declined to publish my story, so did those so-called "human rights
> > >>groups" such as the "Human Rights Watch", etc. It is a best
> > >>illustration of hypocrisy of "Western democracy and freedom".
> > >>http://www.geocities.com/wliao.geo/Please visit my site
> > >
> > >
Received on Sat Dec 20 2003 - 17:30:23 PST